Importance of Publication Audit, fast track processing and categorization of manuscripts

نویسنده

  • Shaukat Ali Jawaid
چکیده

Publication audit is a very useful tool to evaluate progress of a journal and plan for the future.1 We have been doing this exercise for the last quite a few years.. During the Year 2016 we received 1703 manuscripts of which three hundred twenty one were published, 1386 were not accepted for further processing due to various reasons, two were rejected because of plagiarism while twelve were withdrawn by the authors. Majority of the manuscripts from Pakistan as expected were submitted from Karachi (116) followed by Lahore (87) and Islamabad (26). Table-I, Table-II, Table-III. It must be mentioned here that we only screen those manuscripts for plagiarism which are accepted for further processing after initial internal review but before they are sent for external review. Some of these authors are advised to rewrite their manuscripts to reduce the similarity index score to come within acceptable limit of less than 20% before they are accepted for further processing. Original articles were the largest category of manuscripts published during 2016(Table-IV). Details regarding the name of the countries from which we received manuscripts published during the Year 2016 are given in Table-V. Last ten year’s analysis shows that our acceptance rate has constantly reduced from 50% in 2006 to just about under 20% in 2016. In fact it has remained within 20% over the last many years simply because we have an ever increasing number of submissions thus providing us an opportunity to be selective and accept only high quality manuscripts relevant Publication Audit

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication

Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxim...

متن کامل

Quality of Publication Ethics in the Instructions to the Authors of Iranian Journals of Medical Sciences

Providing a perfect instruction to authors can prevent most potential publication ethics errors. This study was conducted to determine the quality of ethical considerations in the instructions to the authors of Iranian research scientific journals of medical sciences (accredited by the Commission for Accreditation and Improvement of Iranian Medical Journals) in October 2011. Checklist items (n=...

متن کامل

List of Reviewers of IJRR issues 2015 - ACKNOWLEGMENT

Many scientists and colleagues from abroad and inside Iran (listed below) voluntarily helped us very much in review and evaluation process of manuscripts being accepted for publication in 2015 issues of IJRR (volume 13, numbers 1-4) and those not suitable for publication. Indeed their careful and critically reading the manuscripts and their valuable comments and suggestions greatly improved the...

متن کامل

ACKNOWLEGMENT

Many scientists and colleagues from abroad and Iran (listed below) voluntarily helped us very much in review and evaluation process of manuscripts being accepted for publication in 2020 issues of IJRR (Volume 18, numbers 1-4) and those not suitable for publication. Indeed their careful and critically reading the manuscripts and their valuable comments and suggestions greatly improved the qualit...

متن کامل

Iranian Scholars’ Revision of Their Submitted Manuscripts: Signaling Impersonality in Text

Nonnative English-speaking scholars have often been reported to be at a disadvantage vis-à-vis their English native counterparts when it comes to writing a publishable research article (RA). When they submit their manuscripts to English-language journals, they sometimes receive comments criticizing their faulty English. One area of difficulty for these authors is the grammaticalization of neutr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 33  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017